State v. Sistrunk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[t]he state’s failure to follow up on the indictment and conduct any , inquiry into respondent’s whereabouts weighs heavily against the state under the second Barker test”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Minnesota v. David Ernest Osorio
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-12-14· cited 3×
• State v. Strobel
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2018-11-19· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barker v. Wingo
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
• Moore v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 594×
• State v. Stitzel
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-07-17· cited 9×
• State v. Brooke
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-02-18· cited 8×
• STATE OF MINN., CITY OF LITTLE CANADA v. Rachie
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-08-02· cited 2×