State of Minnesota v. David Ernest Osorio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We therefore hold that the Nafstad presumption applies here.... Under the Nafstad presumption, receipt is presumed.”
• considering reason for delay before defendant asserted his speedy-trial right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).