State v. Simpson

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 2700

Syllabus

The trial court complied literally with the requirements of Crim.R. 11 during appellant's plea colloquy, and appellant has not established that he did not enter his pleas intelligently, knowingly and voluntarily. Although appellant claims that he did not understand that he would not have the right to appeal in a case in which all charges against him were dismissed without prejudice, the record indicates that appellant understood the ramifications of entering pleas. In addition, appellant has not demonstrated that his defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to explain that he would not have the right to appeal in a case in which all charges against him were dismissed without prejudice. The record includes no evidence of counsel's purported failure to explain, nor has appellant shown that the purported failure to explain has resulted in any prejudice. Judgment affirmed.