Skip to main content

State v. Simpson

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 4684

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's application for postconviction DNA testing under the authority of R.C. 2953.74 where the requested DNA testing would not be outcome determinative and where appellant's identity as one of the victim's assailants was not an issue during trial. The trial court also did not err by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing on appellant's application, as R.C. 2953.73(D) specifically provides that such a hearing is not required. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hanseman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.