State v. Simpson
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4684
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's application for postconviction DNA testing under the authority of R.C. 2953.74 where the requested DNA testing would not be outcome determinative and where appellant's identity as one of the victim's assailants was not an issue during trial. The trial court also did not err by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing on appellant's application, as R.C. 2953.73(D) specifically provides that such a hearing is not required. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hanseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
- State v. ScottOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-02· cited 19×
- State v. McHenryOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-10· cited 11×
- State v. SimpsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-15· cited 4×
- State v. HarwellOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-05· cited 4×
- State v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-15· cited 4×
- State v. RileyOhio Supreme Court· 2024-12-09· cited 4×
- State v. RowetonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.