Skip to main content
· 6/6/2025

State v. Roweton

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2027

Syllabus

After appellant served a portion of his jail terms in three cases, the trial court suspended his jail sentences with conditions. Appellant appeals from the trial court's judgments reimposing the suspended jail sentences after he violated a condition of his release. Appellant's challenge to the aggregate length of his jail sentences was barred by res judicata, because he could have challenged it when the sentences were originally imposed. The trial court erred in failing to calculate the amount of jail-time credit to which he was entitled in each case. Judgments reversed in part and remanded for resentencing on jail-time credit; judgments affirmed in all other respects.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.