State v. Shimon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is “inconceivable” that a reading of the radar unit prior to the readout taken of defendant’s speed, a subsequent testing of the radar unit with a tuning fork and the testing of the radar unit against the speedometer of the police vehicle all were inaccurate
• holding that it is \inconceivable\ that a reading of the radar unit prior to the readout taken of defendant's speed, a subsequent testing of the radar unit with a tuning fork and the testing of the radar unit against the speedometer of the police vehicle all were inaccurate
• radar speed measuring device must be tested for accuracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Whynaught
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-01-03· cited 30×
• State v. Dale
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-01-02· cited 13×
• State v. Kramer
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1981-01-06· cited 12×
• Myatt v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-10-09· cited 8×
• Denton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-12-26· cited 6×
• Denton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-10-18· cited 5×
• State v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1998-11-25· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Magri
  New York Court of Appeals· 1958-01-16· cited 64×
• People v. Dusing
  New York Court of Appeals· 1959-01-08· cited 43×
• People v. Stephens
  New York County Courts· 1967-02-28· cited 12×