· 1/3/1979
Commonwealth v. Whynaught
Citations
- 384 N.E.2d 1212
- 377 Mass. 14
- 1979 Mass. LEXIS 1033
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the determination of the accuracy of a testing method is left to the trial judge’s discretion
- providing survey of cases establishing what tests are sufficient to prove accuracy of radar device
- discussing the need for testing to lay a foundation for admission of speed radar results
- taking judicial notice of radar speedometer as accurate and reliable means of measuring velocity
- \most courts have agreed that the admission of radar evidence is conditioned on a demonstration to the court of the accuracy of the radar apparatus\
- “[C]ourts which have considered the issue have almost uniformly taken judicial notice of radar’s underlying scientific principles ...”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Quirico, Braucher, Wilkins, Liacos
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.