Skip to main content
· 1/3/1979

Commonwealth v. Whynaught

Citations

  • 384 N.E.2d 1212
  • 377 Mass. 14
  • 1979 Mass. LEXIS 1033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the determination of the accuracy of a testing method is left to the trial judge’s discretion
  • providing survey of cases establishing what tests are sufficient to prove accuracy of radar device
  • discussing the need for testing to lay a foundation for admission of speed radar results
  • taking judicial notice of radar speedometer as accurate and reliable means of measuring velocity
  • \most courts have agreed that the admission of radar evidence is conditioned on a demonstration to the court of the accuracy of the radar apparatus\
  • “[C]ourts which have considered the issue have almost uniformly taken judicial notice of radar’s underlying scientific principles ...”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Quirico, Braucher, Wilkins, Liacos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.