Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1/29/2001
State v. Sherrill
Citations
- 545 S.E.2d 110
- 247 Ga. App. 708
- 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 593
- 2001 Ga. App. LEXIS 111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- officer’s testimony that he reported to the roadblock at direction of superior and was under superior’s supervision on site sufficient to establish first LaFontaine factor
- officer's testimony that he reported to the roadblock at direction of superior and was under superior's supervision on site sufficient to establish first LaFontaine factor
- witness had “no personal knowledge of the supervising officer who actually authorized the roadblock, and the State was unable to come forward with this information at the hearing”
- a screening officer only needs to be “sufficiently trained to enable him to make a determination as to which motorists should be asked to take the field sobriety tests”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Johnson, Phipps
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,275×
- Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1994-05-31· cited 478×
- Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-11-23· cited 106×
- State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Georgia· 1974-06-25· cited 97×
- LaFontaine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-03-16· cited 96×
- Klink v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-07-10· cited 30×
- Brent v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-11-16· cited 30×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-03-10· cited 24×
- State v. HollerCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-12-17· cited 17×
- State v. StearnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-11-04· cited 14×
- Albert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-01-28· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.