Skip to main content

State v. Sheppard

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 4882

Syllabus

Under the doctrine of res judicata, appellant was precluded from moving to withdraw his guilty pleas on the grounds that they were not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made and that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. By means of a stipulation in appellant's plea agreement, he waived his argument that his murder and felonious assault offenses were allied offenses of similar import. Nothing in the record demonstrates manifest injustice or that the trial abused its discretion in overruling appellant's motion to withdraw his pleas. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Huffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.