State v. Shepherd

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 4230

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's motion to suppress identification evidence, as the identification process was neither unreliable nor unduly suggestive. However, the trial court did err by failing to give appellant his right of allocution at sentencing. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for the sole purpose of resentencing in compliance with Crim.R. 32(A)(1).