State v. Shattuck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant made statement pursuant to RCW 10.05.020(2); prosecutor submitted statement at trial held after deferred prosecution had been revoked
• stipulation in deferred prosecution agreement to admissibility of police report and waiving procedural or legal defenses treated as valid and binding
• “[T]he overall design of the statute is to provide a streamlined procedure by which those with substance abuse problems will be encouraged to seek treatment and rehabilitation in lieu of criminal prosecution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Colquitt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-06-29· cited 59×
• Abad v. Cozza
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-02-15· cited 34×
• State v. Melick
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-03-06· cited 16×
• Alwood v. Aukeen District Court Commissioner Harper
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-22· cited 8×
• State v. Varnell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-04-10· cited 8×
• State v. Drum
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-03-25· cited 8×
• Abad v. Cozza
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-05-09· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Fitzsimmons
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-05-01· cited 92×
• State v. Fitzsimmons
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-12-18· cited 72×
• State v. Johnson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-08-29· cited 34×
• State v. Wood
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-09-08· cited 15×
• State v. Bennett
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-11-12· cited 12×
• State v. Postema
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-12· cited 7×