Idaho Court of Appeals· 3/8/2007
State v. Shafer
Citations
- 161 P.3d 689
- 144 Idaho 370
- 2007 Ida. App. LEXIS 19
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the inclusion of a provision contemplating restitution in an “amount to be determined” suggests that both parties anticipated that restitution would be paid in some amount, making the defendant responsible for paying the later determined amount
- determining that restitution could not be awarded under section 19-5304(2), but restitution could 9 be awarded under section 19-5304(9) because the defendant agreed in the plea agreement to pay restitution in an “amount to be determined”
- restitution may not be imposed where there is no evidence of loss resulting from criminal act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lansing, Perry, Gutierrez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CorbusIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-03-22· cited 77×
- State v. Jerry Allan HillIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-11-27· cited 29×
- State v. CottrellIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-02-08· cited 22×
- State v. Jacob M. TorrezIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-03-10· cited 16×
- State v. SchultzIdaho Court of Appeals· 2008-12-15· cited 10×
- State v. Kristi L. HurlesIdaho Supreme Court· 2015-05-21· cited 6×
- State v. PersonIdaho Court of Appeals· 2007-10-31· cited 5×
- State v. Brandon EddinsIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-02-10· cited 3×
- State v. Kristi L. HurlesIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-01-17
- State v. Tricia FranklinIdaho Court of Appeals· 2016-08-04
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KrallWashington Supreme Court· 1994-10-20· cited 139×
- State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court· 1999-04-15· cited 104×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-25· cited 87×
- State v. RichmondIdaho Court of Appeals· 2002-03-14· cited 77×
- State v. HawkinsIdaho Court of Appeals· 1998-04-13· cited 75×
- State v. HartwellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-07-19· cited 44×
- State v. JafekIdaho Supreme Court· 2005-01-28· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. CooperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-30· cited 32×
- State v. HvalCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-09· cited 32×
- State v. FuhrimanIdaho Court of Appeals· 2002-08-07· cited 28×
- State v. EastmanOregon Supreme Court· 1981-12-09· cited 26×
- State v. StarkeySupreme Court of Iowa· 1989-03-22· cited 25×
- State v. AubertIdaho Court of Appeals· 1991-06-19· cited 23×
- United States v. Norman FeigenbaumSecond Circuit· 1992-04-29· cited 21×
- State v. DoeIdaho Court of Appeals· 2003-01-07· cited 20×
- State v. AllenIdaho Court of Appeals· 2006-04-04· cited 18×
- State v. ThomasIdaho Court of Appeals· 1999-12-13· cited 17×
- State v. BeaudoinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1986-02-03· cited 15×
- State v. DorseyIdaho Court of Appeals· 1995-01-31· cited 12×
- State v. JoyceSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-05-26· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.