State v. Dorsey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding because defendant only disputed the timeliness of restitution claim below, he could not raise challenge to restitution order on different legal ground on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mosqueda
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-12-30· cited 29×
• State v. Taie
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2003-05-23· cited 23×
• State v. Stachowski
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-11-20· cited 23×
• State v. Cottrell
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2012-02-08· cited 22×
• State v. Shafer
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2007-03-08· cited 21×
• State v. Breeden
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1997-02-10· cited 18×
• State v. Schultz
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2008-12-15· cited 10×
• State v. McCool
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2003-06-13