Skip to main content

State v. Shafer

Citations

  • 351 P.2d 941
  • 222 Or. 230
  • 1960 Ore. LEXIS 467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a principle underlying timeliness of mistrial motion is that the trial court have the ability to “mend the harm”
  • generally, a mistrial motion is timely if it is made when the allegedly objectionable error was made
  • “The time to move for a mistrial is when the allegedly prejudicial act occurs, not after the incident has been allowed to pass by, for then it is too late for the trial judge to caution the jury and mend the harm.”
  • “The time to move for a mistrial is when the allegedly prejudicial act occurs, not after the incident has been allowed to pass by, for then it is too late for the trial judge to caution the jury and mend the harm.”
  • “The time to move for a mistrial is when the allegedly prejudicial act occurs, not after the incident has been allowed to pass by, for then it is too late for the trial judge to caution the jury and mend the harm.”
  • “The time to move for a mistrial is when the allegedly prejudicial act occurs, not after the incident has been allowed to pass by, for then it is too late for the trial judge to caution the jury and mend the harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAllister, O'Connell, Goodwin, Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.