State v. Shabazz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that because the common meaning of \consent\ subsumed both express and implied consent, the jury should have been given a more specific definition
• “Hence, like the supreme court in Rogan, we cannot conclude that the case against [the defendants], which hinged on the credibility of the Complainant, was so overwhelming as to outweigh the inflammatory effect of the deputy prosecutor’s comments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wood v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2011-06-27· cited 261×
• State v. Schnabel.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-05-11· cited 36×
• State v. Faria
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-12-30· cited 19×
• People v. Foster
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-06-06· cited 15×
• State v. Kiakona
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2006-04-12· cited 11×
• State v. Bruce.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2017-10-09· cited 5×
• BDG International, Inc. v. Bowers
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-04-11· cited 5×
• Arizona Cannabis Nurses Ass'n v. Arizona Department of Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-03-16· cited 5×
• People of Guam v. Jefta Moses
  Supreme Court of Guam· 2022-12-29· cited 3×
• State v. David
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30
• State v. Lajala.
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2021-03-30
• State v. Shabazz
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-06-28
• State v. Shabazz
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-07-15
• State v. Ancheta
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2005-09-20