Skip to main content

State v. Sexton

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 573

Syllabus

Appellant's guilty pleas to aggravated possession of drugs and attempted escape were knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made, and the trial court did not err in failing to \clear-up\ any purported \confusion\ on the part of Appellant regarding her pleas. The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences. Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., concurring in judgment only.)

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.