State v. Moore
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 2111
Syllabus
Trial court did not commit error, plain or otherwise, in failing to merge one count of robbery with the abduction count, both of which stemmed from the robbery of a gas station defendant's act of pursuing a fleeing employee and bringing him back to the store's register constituted an abduction separate from the robbery. Trial counsel did not act deficiently in failing to request merger of the robbery and abduction counts. The trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences was not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
- State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court· 1979-12-19· cited 696×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. Earley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-11-10· cited 146×
- State v. LeopardOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 135×
- State v. WinnOhio Supreme Court· 2009-03-17· cited 67×
- State v. RameyOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-22· cited 33×
- State v. FyffeOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-12· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.