Supreme Court of Vermont· 6/9/2006
State v. Sexton
Citations
- 2006 VT 55
- 904 A.2d 1092
- 180 Vt. 34
- 2006 Vt. LEXIS 134
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding defendant can be not responsible for his conduct as result of independently preexisting mental disease or defect
- holding defendant can be not responsible for his conduct as result of preexisting mental disease or defect
- holding defendant can be not responsible for his conduct as result of independently preexisting mental disease or defect
- holding defendant can be not responsible for his conduct as result of preexisting mental disease or defect
- absent abuse of discretion, error of law, or insufficient evidentiary support for trial court’s decision, decree in termination of parental rights proceeding must stand
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Johnson, Skoglund, Reiber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. GrantColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-01-25· cited 320×
- Fly Fish Vermont, Inc. v. Chapin Hill Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2010-04-23· cited 35×
- Morgan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-07-10· cited 33×
- State v. BrennauerNebraska Supreme Court· 2023-07-28· cited 27×
- State v. CongressSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-12-05· cited 23×
- State v. Jonathan BrunoSupreme Court of Vermont· 2012-10-05· cited 22×
- White v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2006-11-03· cited 20×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-05-16· cited 16×
- McNeil v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-10-04· cited 13×
- Berry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2012-06-20· cited 10×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-08-26· cited 8×
- State v. Keith J. BairdSupreme Court of Vermont· 2017-08-25· cited 7×
- People v. McCauleyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-02-19· cited 3×
- State v. TheriaultSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-11-04· cited 3×
- State v. Jason RobertsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2024-06-07· cited 3×
- Jason L. Bloomfield v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2016-09-30· cited 2×
- State v. Steven D. BourgoinSupreme Court of Vermont· 2021-03-12· cited 1×
- Thomas, Andre LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-03-18
- State v. FolksCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-07
Cites
74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 1,180×
- Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 816×
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 697×
- State v. BassArizona Supreme Court· 2000-11-09· cited 586×
- Durham v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1954-09-10· cited 486×
- People v. FreeIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 459×
- United States Ex Rel. Smith v. BaldiSupreme Court· 1953-02-09· cited 253×
- Commonwealth v. HenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-02-08· cited 120×
- Commonwealth v. ShelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-08-21· cited 105×
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-12-26· cited 88×
- Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-05-06· cited 88×
- State v. PelicanSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-07-23· cited 75×
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-01-16· cited 70×
- State v. ClokeyIdaho Supreme Court· 1961-06-22· cited 69×
- State v. HerreraUtah Supreme Court· 1995-04-21· cited 69×
- State v. KorellMontana Supreme Court· 1984-11-16· cited 65×
- State v. SearcyIdaho Supreme Court· 1990-09-05· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. SheehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-12-11· cited 61×
- State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-02-10· cited 58×
- State v. WheelockSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-04-03· cited 57×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.