State v. Sewell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying suppression motion where alleged inaccuracies were made in good faith and were immaterial
• denying suppression motion where alleged inaccuracies were made in good faith and were immaterial
• detective's good faith claim that he conducted the controlled buy was a negligent misstatement that did not justify striking down warrant
• detective’s good faith claim that he conducted the controlled buy was a negligent misstatement that did not justify striking down warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Chenoweth
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-05-24· cited 114×
• State v. Casal
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-05-23· cited 57×
• State v. Atchley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-12-18· cited 28×
• State v. Larson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-06-06· cited 14×
• State v. Chenoweth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-16· cited 5×
• State v. Mathiesen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-09-15· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rugendorf v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 725×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-12-26· cited 26×
• State v. Goodlow
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-07-01· cited 22×
• State v. Hink
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1972-01-21· cited 22×
• State v. Lehman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-02-28· cited 15×
• State v. Edwards
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1971-12-20· cited 6×