Skip to main content
· 5/23/1985

State v. Casal

Citations

  • 699 P.2d 1234
  • 103 Wash. 2d 812
  • 1985 Wash. LEXIS 1131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where a defendant offers information that casts reasonable doubt as to the veracity of material representations by the affiant and the challenged statements are the only basis for probable cause, the court should exercise its discretion to conduct an in camera examination
  • holding that where a defendant offers information that casts reasonable doubt as to the veracity of material representations by the affiant and the challenged statements are the only basis for probable cause, the court should exercise its discretion to conduct an in camera examination
  • where defendant “casts a reasonable doubt” as to veracity of material representations made by the affiant, judge should exercise discretion to conduct in camera hearing on veracity issue
  • where defendant \casts a reasonable doubt\ as to veracity of material representations made by the affiant, judge should exercise discretion to conduct in camera hearing on veracity issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.