State v. Serna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the elements required for a claim of newly discovered evidence
• “Absent an abuse of discretion, we will not disturb a trial judge’s determination that a new trial for newly discovered evidence is not necessary.”
• whether to grant a defendant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence is for trial court to decide in exercise of its discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Soto-Fong
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-11-19· cited 182×
• State v. Nordstrom
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 119×
• State v. Dunlap
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-09-05· cited 108×
• State v. Schaaf
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-10-16· cited 65×
• State v. Henry
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-11-12· cited 64×
• State v. Fisher
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-09-02· cited 24×
• State v. Saenz
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-04-06· cited 19×
• State v. Medrano
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-12-17· cited 14×
• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2021-02-04· cited 11×
• Julian v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 2002-07-02· cited 10×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McDougall v. North Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1983-10-03· cited 975×
• State v. Jeffers
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 217×
• State v. Fisher
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-06-14· cited 190×
• Fisher v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1984-11-26· cited 63×
• State v. Serna
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-01-23· cited 42×
• State v. Blankenship
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-14· cited 34×
• State v. Turner
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-06-11· cited 19×
• State v. Schantz
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-05-11· cited 15×
• State v. Salinas
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-06-30· cited 10×
• State v. Urry
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-03-06· cited 7×