Skip to main content

State v. Sepeda

Citations

  • 157 N.E.3d 889
  • 2020 Ohio 4167

Syllabus

New trial is necessary because trial court abused its discretion in preventing appellant from introducing evidence of alleged victim's prior confrontation with a third party under factually similar circumstances.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.