State v. Seifert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• destroyed evidence must possess exculpatory value apparent before the evidence was destroyed, and comparable evidence must be unattainable by other reasonably available means

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Delisle
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-07-01· cited 102×
• State v. Wheelock
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-04-03· cited 57×
• State v. Lenore Hayes
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-09-09· cited 6×
• State v. Shaw
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-05-29· cited 3×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• California v. Trombetta
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
• Arizona v. Youngblood
  Supreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
• People v. Zamora
  California Supreme Court· 1980-08-28· cited 126×
• State v. Bailey
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-01-27· cited 64×
• State v. Hicks
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-08-14· cited 42×
• Spears v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1908-03-15· cited 33×
• State v. Duff
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-08-26· cited 31×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-09-07· cited 21×
• Collette v. Bousley
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1982-06-16· cited 10×
• State v. Jacques
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-07-02· cited 2×