Court of Appeals of Kansas· 3/9/2007
State v. Scoville
Citations
- 37 Kan. App. 2d 341
- 152 P.3d 1262
- 2007 Kan. App. LEXIS 252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding substantial competent evidence shows that Scoville “knew of his appeal rights”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buser, Larson, Malone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-02-27· cited 196×
- State v. McAdamSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-01-30· cited 74×
- State v. HaydenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-03-17· cited 73×
- State v. PhinneySupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-11-10· cited 55×
- State v. LegeroSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-06-25· cited 37×
- State v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-10-30· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.