State v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the statutory right to appeal is limited to appeals by aggrieved parties from final judgments” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• proof of aggrievement is essential prerequisite to Appellate Court’s jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Francis
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-03-11· cited 6×
• Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Munsill-Borden Mansion, LLC
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-12-10· cited 6×
• Cruz v. Visual Perceptions, LLC
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-02-11
• Alston v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-12-09

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Alford
  Supreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
• State v. Casiano
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-05-29· cited 56×
• Bowden v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-01-24· cited 21×
• State v. Casiano
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-06-22· cited 17×
• State v. Pentland
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-18· cited 13×
• Madagoski v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-12-11· cited 9×
• Hunt v. Guimond
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-05-14· cited 9×
• State v. Jimenez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-04-05· cited 3×