State v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Before considering a defendant' s motion for a new trial based on a victim' s recantation, the trial court must determine whether the recantation is credible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. MacDonald
  Washington Supreme Court· 2015-04-09· cited 42×
• State v. Statler
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-03-15· cited 23×
• State v. Larson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-03-15· cited 18×
• State v. Gassman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-03-15· cited 12×
• Brian F. Hall v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2025-11-28

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Alford
  Supreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
• Schlup v. Delo
  Supreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 7,671×
• State v. Brockob
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 202×
• State v. Aten
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-11-27· cited 189×
• State v. Downing
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-04-15· cited 152×
• State v. Macon
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-03-07· cited 64×
• In Re Brown
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-04-19· cited 48×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Brown
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-04-19· cited 48×
• State v. D.T.M.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-06-20· cited 31×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Turay
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 25×
• In Re Turay
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 24×
• State v. Ieng
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-09-08· cited 17×
• Crista Senior Community v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-04-03· cited 7×