State v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that while “the police cannot hamper a motorist’s efforts 12 to obtain independent testing, they are under no duty to assist in obtaining such 13 testing beyond allowing telephone calls to secure the test”
• “[W]hile . . . the police cannot hamper a 14 motorist’s efforts to obtain independent testing, they are under no duty to assist in 15 obtaining such testing beyond allowing telephone calls to secure the test.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• A.C. Ford v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-01-13· cited 50×
• State v. Masood
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-10-09· cited 3×
• State v. Henry
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-01-09· cited 3×
• State v. Verschelde
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-11-03· cited 1×
• State v. Verdon
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-02-20· cited 1×
• State v. Chakerian
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-01-14
• State v. McKinney
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-12-09

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Stutelberg
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-02-21· cited 15×
• State v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-07-26· cited 4×
• State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Certified Services, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-12-06· cited 2×