State v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• warrant authorizing a search for and seizure of \employment and business records\ was not impermissibly broad

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Stenson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 921×
• State v. Frye
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-06-05· cited 13×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chimel v. California
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
• Spinelli v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
• Marron v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1927-11-21· cited 1,400×
• Stanford v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 948×
• State v. Wright
  Washington Supreme Court· 1976-12-09· cited 89×
• State v. Badda
  Washington Supreme Court· 1963-10-24· cited 82×
• United States v. Gwendolyn E. Johnson
  D.C. Circuit· 1973-05-11· cited 59×
• State v. Withers
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1972-12-20· cited 36×
• State v. Dimmer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1972-06-01· cited 32×
• United States v. James Warren Thompson
  D.C. Circuit· 1974-03-27· cited 28×
• City of Tacoma v. Mundell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1972-04-05· cited 25×
• State v. Hartnell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1976-05-03· cited 18×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-07-21· cited 4×