Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/24/2022
State v. Scott
Citations
- 317 Or. App. 777
- 505 P.3d 1007
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We consider whether defendant’s question about whether she should ask for a lawyer was an invocation of her right to counsel and readily conclude that it was not.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Powers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 205×
- State v. Maciel-FigueroaOregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-02· cited 137×
- State v. KellOregon Supreme Court· 1987-03-24· cited 68×
- State v. McAnultyOregon Supreme Court· 2014-10-30· cited 53×
- State v. MazzolaOregon Supreme Court· 2015-03-05· cited 40×
- State v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court· 2021-12-30· cited 35×
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-04-04· cited 29×
- State v. Avila-NavaOregon Supreme Court· 2014-12-26· cited 28×
- State v. NicholsOregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-02· cited 19×
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-17· cited 19×
- State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-01· cited 17×
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-09· cited 10×
- State v. BrownleeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-04· cited 10×
- Crainic v. Multnomah County Adult Care Home ProgramCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-10-22· cited 8×
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.