State v. Scheer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We do not mean to suggest that it is necessary for the informant to describe the particular quantity involved.”
• affidavit which stated that informant had observed “a quantity of green vegetable material” that he identified as marijuana was insufficient to justify the belief that it would be there at a later time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Swearingen v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-06-23· cited 369×
• State v. Lovato
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-03-11· cited 22×
• State v. Wilson/Helms
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-02-11· cited 17×
• State v. Horwedel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-01-11· cited 17×
• State v. Middleton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-05-22· cited 6×
• State v. Koppenhafer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-09-15· cited 6×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-04-20· cited 4×
• State v. Pearson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-07-18· cited 3×
• State v. Goff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-04-26· cited 1×
• Swearingen, Rodney
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-06-23
• State v. Usher
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Montigue
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-01-22· cited 67×
• State v. Carlile
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-11-28· cited 51×
• State v. Kittredge
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-10-16· cited 23×
• State v. Spicer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1969-07-16· cited 20×