State v. Horwedel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is not necessary that an affiant describe the informant’s familiarity with the specific drug at issue”
• informant’s statement that he had seen “opium of a quantity that would denote more than simple personal use” was sufficient to establish that it would probably still be there 36 hours later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).