State v. Scharf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exercising discretion to reach unpreserved claim of error after concluding that the error was not harmless
• exercising discretion to reach unpreserved claim of error after concluding that the error was not harmless
• reversing judgment committing the appellant, who was represented by counsel, on the ground that trial court failed to comply with ORS 426.100(1)
• violation of ORS 426.100(1) is not harmless where the record does not demonstrate that the “appellant was adequately advised of his rights or that he, in fact, exercised those rights at the hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. M. L. R.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-15· cited 56×
• State v. S. J. F.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-21· cited 30×
• State v. M. T.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-07-13· cited 14×
• State v. MT
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-07-13· cited 12×
• State v. SJF
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-21
• State v. S. N.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-03-06
• State v. N. S.-R.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-05
• State v. C. E. W.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-03-18

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ritzman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-02-25· cited 30×
• State v. Burge
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-17· cited 10×
• State v. Bartel-Dawson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-09-12· cited 5×