State v. Ritzman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to advise the appellant of the information required by ORS 426.100(1) was harmless where the appellant had received a written notice that con- tained all of the required information, the notice had been read to her, and she had signed and dated it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).