Skip to main content
· 5/15/1882

State v. Scarlett

Citations

  • 38 Ark. 563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting sleeping victim was “not capable of resisting or appraising the nature of her conduct” under § 28-319(1)(b)
  • upholding defendant’s conviction for first degree sexual assault in part under § 28-319(l)(b) based on evidence that victim was asleep when portions of act of oral sex occurred and thus was not capable of resisting or appraising nature of her conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.