· 5/15/1882
State v. Scarlett
Citations
- 38 Ark. 563
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting sleeping victim was “not capable of resisting or appraising the nature of her conduct” under § 28-319(1)(b)
- upholding defendant’s conviction for first degree sexual assault in part under § 28-319(l)(b) based on evidence that victim was asleep when portions of act of oral sex occurred and thus was not capable of resisting or appraising nature of her conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.