In the Interest of Hochmuth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the challenged statute was not impermissibly vague “as applied” where the necessary conditions' to avoid termination of parental rights were communicated and explained to both verbally and in writing
• “[A] statute otherwise unconstitutional because of vagueness may be salvaged by a limiting interpretation which brings the application of the statute within constitutional bounds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).