Court of Appeals of Arizona· 3/15/1985

State v. Savant

Citations

705 P.2d 1357
146 Ariz. 306
1985 Ariz. App. LEXIS 601

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

statements made to undercover agents admissible as coconspirator statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livermore, Hathaway, Lacagnina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Wooten
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-09-04· cited 15×
State v. Stanley
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-02-09· cited 12×
Trevizo v. Astec Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-12-03· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Ohio v. Roberts
Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
McDougall v. North Carolina
Supreme Court· 1983-10-03· cited 975×
State v. Adamson
Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-11· cited 201×
United States v. James A. Blakey and Louis A. Berry
Seventh Circuit· 1979-10-25· cited 117×
State v. Martin
Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-01-31· cited 77×
State v. Baumann
Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 72×
State v. Melendez
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-12-14· cited 23×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.