Skip to main content

State v. Saunders

Citations

  • 245 N.E.3d 889
  • 2024 Ohio 2224

Syllabus

R.C. 2945.482 Confrontation Clause R.C. 5123.01 Developmental Disability. Defendant-appellant's right to confrontation was not violated during the trial, when the victim testified by closed-circuit television from a different room than where defendant-appellant and the jury were present. The testifying victim qualified as a developmentally-disabled person, pursuant to R.C. 2123.031, and the requirements of R.C. 2945.482(D) were met.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Craig under both the Ohio and Federal Constitutions to permit one-way video testimony despite a face-to-face clause in the Ohio Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.