State v. Saunders

Citations

• 204 N.E.3d 1237
• 2022 Ohio 4739

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in overruling appellant's motion to dismiss the charges against him based on a statutory speedy-trial violation. In light of various tolling events, appellant was brought to trial within the speedy-trial deadline. Appellant's convictions for tampering with records, telecommunications fraud, and obstructing official business were supported by legally sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The record does not portray ineffective assistance of counsel based on appellant's trial attorney's failure to retain an expert witness, to cross examine a detective, or to admit into evidence a full report generated from downloaded content from appellant's Google account. Judgment affirmed.