State v. Sanchez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• § 28-692.02 does not violate due process because classification is neither arbitrary nor unreasonably defined and the state has valid and continuing interest in maintaining it.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cassius
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-16· cited 38×
• Whorley v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1975-04-28· cited 38×
• Nelson v. Tullos
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1975-12-08· cited 29×
• State v. Love
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1975-09-08· cited 24×
• State v. Zaragoza
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-05-22· cited 10×
• State v. Renteria
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-06-07· cited 9×
• O'Hara v. Superior Ct. of State of Ariz.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-10· cited 7×
• State v. Francis
  Washington Supreme Court· 1975-10-02· cited 6×
• State v. Grogan
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1986-04-16· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reed v. Reed
  Supreme Court· 1971-11-22· cited 1,968×
• Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.
  Supreme Court· 1911-03-20· cited 1,717×
• Baldwin v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 789×
• United States v. Little Lake Misere Land Co.
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 297×
• Berry v. City of Cincinnati
  Supreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 57×
• Martin P. Marston v. R. M. Oliver, Superintendent of the Virginia State Farm
  Fourth Circuit· 1973-10-09· cited 37×
• Uhlmann v. Wren
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-04-15· cited 37×
• City of Cincinnati v. Berry
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1973-05-16· cited 4×