United States v. Little Lake Misere Land Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the agency must “specify in detail which portions of the document are disclosable and which are allegedly exempt.”
• granting summary judgment upon agency's representations \in candor and in good faith\ that all responsive documents were made available to plaintiff
• granting summary judgment upon agency’s representations “in candor and in good faith” that all responsive documents were made available to plaintiff
• mandating a detailed description of each document withheld and a detailed justification for why the exemption applies for each document in its entirety rather than segregable portions thereof
• requiring the government to create a public index listing privileged documents and providing explanations of the claim of privilege
• articulating the Government’s burden to produce meticulous and specific documentation of its claimed justification for nondisclosure under 5 U.S.C. § 552

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).