State v. Samuel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The question of whether court appointed counsel should be discharged is a matter addressed to the discretion of the trial judge. Only in a case of abuse of discretion will this [c]ourt interfere.\ (quoting State v. Sims, 304 S.C. 409, 414, 405 S.E.2d 377, 380 (1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Samuel
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-02-28· cited 20×
• City of Columbia v. Assa'ad-Faltas
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-06-21· cited 3×
• State v. Mazique
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-10-19· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District
  Supreme Court· 2000-01-24· cited 840×
• State v. Pagan
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 319×
• United States v. West
  Fourth Circuit· 1989-06-08· cited 223×
• United States v. Clinton Bernard Frazier-El
  Fourth Circuit· 2000-03-02· cited 198×
• State v. Sims
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-24· cited 97×
• Bobby R. Savage v. Wayne Estelle, Warden
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-02-05· cited 56×
• United States v. Domingo Lopez-Osuna
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-03-16· cited 32×
• State v. Barnes
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-01-15· cited 20×
• State v. Dorce
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-12-19· cited 8×