State v. Salmon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing South Carolina expungement statute and determining that a person found not guilty by reason of insanity cannot be said to have had charge dismissed or to have been found innocent of the charge
• Where terms of statute are clear and unambiguous, they must be applied according to their literal meaning
• legislature did not think a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity necessitated destruction of police records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. Dickinson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-02-26· cited 15×
• Rainey v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-27· cited 6×
• State v. Edwards
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-10-08· cited 6×
• United States v. Charleston County School District
  D. South Carolina· 1990-06-05· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. B.C.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-09-06· cited 6×
• State v. Grimes
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-04-27· cited 3×
• State of New Hampshire v. Thomas A. Bulcroft
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-08-22· cited 2×
• SC DEPT. HWYS. & PUB. TRANS. v. Dickinson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-02-26

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Green v. Zimmerman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-10-19· cited 13×
• State v. Harris
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-02-03· cited 4×