State v. Salinas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Washington eavesdropping statute with nearly identical language prohibited the admission of “all information obtained during the time [the officer] was wearing the body wire, whether or not that information was obtained through the aid of the body wire”
• holding that Washington eavesdropping statute with nearly identical language prohibited the admission of “all information obtained during the time [the officer] was wearing the body wire, whether or not that information was obtained through the aid of the body wire”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Clark
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-01-09· cited 99×
• State v. Clark
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 99×
• State v. Faford
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-02-01· cited 48×
• Schonauer v. DCR Entertainment, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-11-16· cited 34×
• State v. Wojtyna
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-07-26· cited 22×
• State v. Jimenez
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-03-07· cited 14×
• State v. Gonzalez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-11-23· cited 13×
• State v. Jimenez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-01-17· cited 7×
• State v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-07-26· cited 6×
• State Of Washington, V. Mehmet Bilgi
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-10-19· cited 5×
• People v. Harris
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-08-21· cited 5×
• State v. Costello
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-11-21· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Salinas
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 1,796×
• State v. Fjermestad
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-06-07· cited 165×
• State v. Salinas
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-24· cited 3×