State v. Sage

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 2130

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's various pro se motions challenging his sentence as void, as all the claims asserted in the motions were barred by the doctrine of res judicata or were otherwise unsupported by the record. The trial court also did not err by issuing a nunc pro tunc entry for purposes of amending appellant's resentencing entry to accurately reflect the trial court's resentencing decision. Judgment affirmed.