Missouri Court of Appeals· 4/24/2012
State v. Sachs
Citations
- 372 S.W.3d 56
- 2012 WL 1392573
- 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 571
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- comparing the use of a mouse or keyboard to shuffle between files not plainly visible on an active computer screen to opening and looking through filing cabinets or desk drawers
- “When [the police detective] began clicking on icons on Appellant’s computer screen to view different programs that were not openly visible on the computer screen, he was conducting a search.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellis, Howard, Pfeiffer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 2,107×
- United States v. StultsEighth Circuit· 2009-08-14· cited 212×
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri· 2009-08-04· cited 102×
- State v. GraysonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-03-29· cited 67×
- State v. FaruqiSupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-08-02· cited 42×
- United States v. PaytonNinth Circuit· 2009-07-21· cited 31×
- State v. CromerMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-12-27· cited 24×
- State v. BynumMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-11-24· cited 17×
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-02-23· cited 12×
- State v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-06-26· cited 11×
- State v. WarrenMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-03-16· cited 10×
- State v. TremaineMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-07-27· cited 9×
- State v. LoydMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-04-12· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.