State v. Ryan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the amount of restitution is not “determined” within the meaning of the statute until an objecting defendant receives a restitution hearing, in the context of objecting to an ex parte restitution order
• restitution amounts not objected to are deemed acknowledged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hughes
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-04-14· cited 352×
• State v. Moen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 159×
• State v. Hennings
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 101×
• State v. Gray
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-07-19· cited 72×
• State v. Hunsicker
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 31×
• State v. Hahn
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-14· cited 27×
• State v. Burmaster
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-06-01· cited 6×
• State v. Burmaster
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-07-12· cited 5×
• State v. Griffith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-01-30· cited 5×
• State v. Griffith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-02-20

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Krall
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-10-20· cited 139×
• State v. Zakel
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-08-20· cited 47×
• State v. Tindal
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-01-20· cited 17×
• State v. Raleigh
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-01-08· cited 16×
• State v. Pockert
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-01-10· cited 12×