State v. Rutledge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officers could open small leather container found next to driver’s seat
• holding that the inventory was lawful where the relevant ordinance allowed the inventory of coin purses and where the officer believed that the container at issue was a coin purse, even though the container was actually a shaving kit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Connally
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-12-15· cited 32×
• State v. Keady
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-08-11· cited 7×
• State v. Tschantre
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-03· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Florida v. Wells
  Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,010×
• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• State v. Atkinson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 164×
• State v. Keller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-06-01· cited 108×
• State v. Perry
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 63×
• State v. Ridderbush
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-12-19· cited 39×
• State v. Mundt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-09-13· cited 30×
• State v. Bean
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-01-27· cited 23×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-22· cited 21×
• State v. Maynard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-07-23· cited 11×