State v. Rutan
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 593
Syllabus
On trial court decision overruling petitioner's motion for leave to file motion for new trial and untimely petition for postconviction relief. Petitioner failed to identify any single piece of evidence or facts that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering, and therefore failed to show how such evidence was either potentially exculpatory as required for new trial or provided a necessary basis for postconviction relief. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Beatty Blunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
- State v. McNealOhio Supreme Court· 2022-08-09· cited 66×
- State v. CashinOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-28· cited 30×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-11· cited 23×
- State v. NoorOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-15· cited 10×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-30· cited 8×
- State v. GraggsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-22· cited 8×
- State v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-06· cited 5×
- Telle v. PasleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.