Skip to main content

State v. Dixon

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4841

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a new trial. The recantation by one of the witnesses who identified appellant as the shooter was not sufficient to establish a strong probability that a different verdict would result when considering the other evidence presented at trial.

Judges: Klatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.