Skip to main content

State v. Russo

Citations

  • 164 N.H. 585
  • 62 A.3d 798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that lack of specifics regarding defendant’s prior criminal conduct reduced prejudicial effect of reference to his parole status
  • holding mistrial not required because testimony did not identify any specific prior charge or conviction and therefore did not unambiguously convey defendant’s prior criminal conduct
  • finding single reference to defendant’s parole status did not unambiguously convey defendant’s prior criminal conduct because it did not identify a specific crime
  • objective to be served by RSA 651:6 pretrial notice requirement is to provide defendant with opportunity to refute findings required by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bassett, Conboy, Dalianis, Hicks, Lynn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.